Subscribe to our RSS feed

The Latest International Stories

  • Home testing
  • Storming the cathedral
  • A very winning prevention combo
  • How does Canada compare?
  • Zero new infections

Revolving Door

Mar27

Harper government moves to block supervised injection services for drug users in Canada

Friday, 27 March 2015 Written by // Guest Authors - Revolving Door Categories // Current Affairs, Legal, Media, Opinion Pieces, Revolving Door, Guest Authors

From Pivot Legal Society in B.C., new bill could make it much harder for Insite to stay open, and effectively prevents a similar health service from opening in any other Canadian city.

Harper government moves to block supervised injection services for drug users in Canada

This article  by Adrienne Smith first appeared on the PIVOTlegal.org website here 

Today, the House of Commons passed Bill C-2, the Respect for Communities Act. Pretty title, but like so much Conservative legislation, the meaning of the title, like the bill, is cruelly ironic. 

What the Respect for Communities Act does is effectively block the establishment of new supervised injection facilities like Insite. The bill could make it much harder for Insite to stay open, and it effectively prevents a similar health service from opening in any other Canadian city. 

Insite arose as a community response to epidemic-levels of HIV and Hepatitis C infections and overdose deaths in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. A decade of research shows that Insite saves lives, and those of us close to the ground understand the central role Insite plays in the tapestry of specialized healthcare the most vulnerable Canadians need. 

Despite the evidence, the site has not operated without controversy. When the last federal Conservative government refused to grant an exemption to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) that would allow Insite to keep its doors open, our community took the fight to protect Insite all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada. It was only through the judicial branch that this life-saving site was able to stay open.  

In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada decided Canada (Attorney General) v. PHS Community Services Society, which established that the Minister of Health's failure to provide an exemption to allow Insite to continue to operate threatened the health and the lives of injection drug users in the Downtown Eastside. The Court held that the Minister's decision violated drug users' constitutional right to life and security of the person. The Court concluded that, "Where, as here, the evidence indicates that a supervised injection site will decrease the risk of death and disease, and there is little or no evidence that it will have a negative impact on public safety, the Minister should generally grant an exemption." [para 152]. 

Harper’s government and the Minister of Health don’t appear to agree with what the court concluded. If they did, Bill C-2 would never have been introduced. This bill turns the court’s direction on its head and says except in exceptional circumstances, exemptions will never be granted. It then sets out a laundry list of extra requirements that applicants for new centres must meet before their applications are even considered. Insite, as the only existing facility operating under an exemption, now has an additional suite of information it must submit about crime data in order to have its application considered. 

What the Harper government is trying to do is wrong. It is also unconstitutional. 

Last November, I went to parliament to explain the Supreme Court decision to a parliamentary committee and to ask them to reject the bill. The government ignored me. And they ignored the mountains of academic research and testimony from legal experts, drug users, and healthcare professionals that say supervised injection sites are the best way to protect the constitutional rights of people who use drugs -- to keep them alive and make them well. 

Despite the evidence and despite the testimonies, today the majority of parliamentarians -- all of them members of the Conservative party -- voted to pass the bill into law. 

It still needs to have three readings and a committee study in the Senate before it officially becomes law, but the clock is ticking for it to be passed before the federal election, which is expected in October. 

If we believe in a vision of Canada that values the health, human rights, and well-being of our communities, this bill must not pass. And if it does, let’s remember in October that the best way for us to respect our communities is to vote for a different government. 

About PIVOT: Located in Vanocuver, B.C., Pivot's mandate is to use the law to address the root causes of poverty and social exclusion. Our name is metaphor for our approach to social change - by making the most tangible violations of human rights the focal point of our efforts, we exert maximum pressure in order to shift society toward greater equality and inclusivity.

  • Home testing

    Home testing

    Alex Sparrowhawk says “In the UK we’re now legally allowed to purchase kits to test for HIV in our own homes. Aside from the drawback that no approved testing kits currently exist in the UK I have more worrying concerns about the change in the law.”
  • Storming the cathedral

    Storming the cathedral

    Bob Leahy and the 1989 ACT Up protest that saw angry demonstrators enter St. Patrick's Cathedral In New York during Mass and disrupt the service - and the drama that followed, including footage of their later appearance on the Phil Donahue TV show
  • A very winning prevention combo

    A very winning prevention combo

    Aidsmap reports that combining PrEP and ART could almost eliminate HIV infection, an east African study finds
  • How does Canada compare?

    How does Canada compare?

    Our contributor Samantha on The Link Up Project that researched the global needs and priorities of young people living with or affected by HIV and some observations on how Canada stacks up on this and other prevention initiatives.
  • Zero new infections

    Zero new infections

    Aidsmap reports that no HIV transmissions from HIV-positive partners were seen in a new Australian gay couples study
  • Breaking news 3: Ipergay study of oral PrEP “on demand”

    Breaking news 3: Ipergay study of oral PrEP “on demand”

    Marc-André LeBlanc is looking at the news from CROI for the latest in HIV prevention. Part three - ”a very significant reduction in HIV risk. And what an incredible coincidence that both PROUD and Ipergay showed the exact same reduction in risk.”
  • Breaking news 2: PROUD study of daily oral PrEP

    Breaking news 2: PROUD study of daily oral PrEP

    Marc-André LeBlanc is looking at the news from CROI for the latest in HIV prevention Part two - ” “Holy crap! That is the highest effectiveness rate of any PrEP study to date,”
  • Breaking news 1: FACTS 001 study of a vaginal microbicide gel

    Breaking news 1: FACTS 001 study of a vaginal microbicide gel

    Marc-André LeBlanc is looking at the news from CROI 2015 for the latest in HIV prevention. Part one – disappointing findings that suggest a vaginal microbicide gel is not going to be a workable HIV prevention option, especially for young African women.
  •  Good news, bad news

    Good news, bad news

    Aidsmap reports HIV testing continues to rise in UK gay men - some men are testing more frequently - but safer sex knowledge drops
  • Lt. Colonel Ken Pinkela's petition

    Lt. Colonel Ken Pinkela's petition

    You read his interview with Bob Leahy on PositiveLite.com. Now Lt Colonel Ken Pinkela, who seems to have been criminalized unjustly, files a petition with 72,983 signatures for a full review of his case.
  • AIDS denialism in London – is it really 2015?

    AIDS denialism in London – is it really 2015?

    A report from London says it’s still alive: “39 million deaths are not enough to prevent a small group of discredited people to continue spreading lies and myths about HIV, alleging that the virus has nothing to do with AIDS, or even denying it exists"

MarketPlace