Subscribe to our RSS feed

Popular News Stories

  • Tom Hanks in Philadelphia Changed my Life
  • Canadian AIDS Society’s AGM and PHA Forum in Ottawa: some scholarships for HIVers available
  • Semen goes viral – or does it?

International AIDS Conference

Here is will you will find the latest information in Vienna coming out on new treatments, and when to start treatments. The conference runs from July 18 - 24.

This section provides you with all the conference-related articles published all in one spot. Other non-conference, including what is found here can be found on my (Brian Finch, founder and publisher) blog, Acid Reflux on PositiveLite.com.

Reporting on the XVIII International AIDS Conference sponsored by Gilead Sciences Canada.

May04

Winning AIDS Conference logo

Saturday, 04 May 2013 Written by // Guest Authors - Revolving Door Categories // International AIDS Conference , Conferences, International , Revolving Door, Guest Authors

Tanzanian youth working with Toronto-based Charitable Organisation wins global logo design competition for International AIDS Conference

Winning AIDS Conference logo

Toronto, Canada – A Tanzanian youth, with links to a Toronto-based charitable organisation, was today announced as having created the winning logo design for AIDS 2014 - the 20th International AIDS Conference – being held in Melbourne, Australia in July 2014. This follows a global competition for youth aged between 10 and 30 years old launched by the International AIDS Society. 

Yohana Haule (21) is a young artist who has been working with the organisation Africa’s Children-Africa’s Future (AC-AF) since October 2011 through their office in Dar es Salaam. AC-AF first met Yohana at his secondary school graduation. Current Executive Director, Dave Christie and founder of AC-AF, Gita Jaffe, were attending as guests of the school and another youth in their programming. Drawn to Yohana’s talent, he would become the first recipient of the AC-AF Youth Leadership Award. The award looks to strengthen the youths’ skills to develop promising talent into concrete actions that can help the youth achieve their dreams. Since then, he has become the resident artist for the organisation, producing artwork used in programming resources for children and in awareness materials currently being used in Canada.

As Christie explains, “This is an incredible achievement for a young man from Dar es Salaam who, like many youth in Tanzania, has faced many hardships to get to where he is today. When we first met Yohana, we were not only struck by his talent, but by the messages that he was portraying through his art. One of the first images he showed to us was a depiction of the roles women play in Tanzania – both in the strength they bring to the country but the burdens they also face. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the burden on women in the AIDS epidemic is particularly harsh, and here was a young man willing to confront some of those issues.”

Toronto has strong links to the International AIDS Conference having hosted the 16th conference in 2006. As a legacy to that conference, the Global AIDS Initiative was established by the City of Toronto, to fund programming concerning HIV and AIDS undertaken by organisations working in sub-Saharan Africa. For the last two years, AC-AF has been part of the coalition of organisations utilising these funds for its work in Tanzania with children and youth. As a result of the budget passed in January at City Hall, this funding will end in August 2013. Although the financial legacy of AIDS 2006 is coming to an end, the work that the City of Toronto has enabled AC-AF to undertake, including with Yohana, will ensure that the contribution of the people of Toronto will have a lasting impact on AIDS 2014.

For AC-AF, this provides a moment of pride in the accomplishments of the youth they work with. At the heart of their programmes and ethos is a continual focus on the potential of children and youth. As Christie explains, “Our programming does not look to just help children; it is aimed at ensuring children and youth help themselves, both now and in the future. They need encouragement to increase their independence, ensuring that they can support themselves, their families and their community, while fulfilling their dreams. Yohana exemplifies this. Although we are able to provide him with some of the initial opportunities, it is ultimately his effort and talent that has brought him this recognition by the International AIDS Society.”

Yohana will continue to work with AC-AF before travelling to Australia in July 2014 to be officially thanked at the conference for his design. This will be the first time that he has travelled outside of Tanzania.

For more information about Africa’s Children-Africa’s Future (AC-AF) visit: www.ac.af.com.

For more information about the AIDS 2014 conference visit: www.aids2014.org.

Jan06

Putting an end to the epidemic - can we do it?

Sunday, 06 January 2013 Written by // Guest Authors - Revolving Door Categories // International AIDS Conference , Conferences, Health, International , Opinion Pieces, Revolving Door, Guest Authors

A US physician ponders the value of AIDS conferences and what they contribute to ending the epidemic. “I believe ending the epidemic is absolutely achievable. But doing so may require a sharp right pivot from current conversations and business as usual.”

Putting an end to the epidemic - can we do it?

This article by Lisa Fitzpatrick, M.D., M.P.H. first appeared on TheBodyPRO.com here. Republished with permission. 

The last two years have been filled with wonderful news for HIV science, including the focus on treatment as prevention, the availability and endorsement of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for high-risk populations, and efforts across the country to scale up testing and linkage to HIV care. Expansive discussions about each of these advancements have loomed large at each infectious diseases-related conference, including the recent 2012 International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2012).

The conference was well attended, with over 20,000 participants spanning the globe. It afforded many of us who have worked for many years in global and domestic HIV/AIDS the opportunity to reconnect with old colleagues, share ideas and network about potential collaboration opportunities. By many measures, AIDS 2012 was a resounding success.

However, as I reflected on whether the conference shifted our focus to achieve a more direct and positive impact on reducing new infections, increasing testing uptake and improving engagement in HIV care, my view dimmed a bit.

The week of AIDS 2012, our clinic registered six patients with newly diagnosed HIV infection. On one hand, these new diagnoses were clearly due to our testing expansion efforts. But at the same time, I asked myself: Why hadn't they benefited from any of the prevention messages and strategies that should have kept them from becoming HIV infected and having to walk through our doors?

I wondered about the magnitude of the financial and human resource investments we have committed to conferences like AIDS 2012, and whether or not these resources should instead be utilized to implement structural interventions that present barriers to prevention, testing, treatment and engagement in care. We know of these barriers because the HIV scientific literature is rich with information naming and describing these challenges. But at AIDS 2012, I didn't hear concrete conversations about a clear and specific strategy to address these challenges.

What is our responsibility to face these issues head-on? What will it really take to turn the tide of this epidemic? Can we really get to zero, and what concrete steps must we take to achieve this? These are the conversations we shun, because the answers are elusive and overwhelming -- and because, for obvious reasons, we like conferences.

Connecting with other HIV stakeholders and hearing about shared hardships, program challenges and concerns from across the country and around the globe lifts our spirits and boosts our morale. These connections remind us we are not struggling to fight this disease alone. That's positive.

But a recurring theme in these conversations is the need for more financial resources to "fight" HIV. The notion that a lack of funding presents the greatest barrier to addressing the epidemic feels shortsighted and uninformed. My experience collaborating within multi-lateral partnerships and with program implementation on the ground causes me to disagree with these ardent cries and demands for increases in funding.

In 2011, the U.S. funding allocation for HIV/AIDS was over $20 billion. That's substantial. We desperately need these funds to address the epidemic, but have we considered how much of this money directly impacts the availability of testing, treatment and engagement in HIV care? It's a fascinating question -- one we can no longer afford to evade.

I believe ending the epidemic is absolutely achievable. But doing so may require a sharp right pivot from current conversations and business as usual.

Nov29

Webinar: 2012 International AIDS Conference overview

Thursday, 29 November 2012 Written by // What's Up Categories // International AIDS Conference , Community Events, Conferences, Events, Health, Living with HIV, Revolving Door, Events, Guest Authors

ACT’s December Community Health Forum provides an overview of two conferences held in 2012: the International AIDS Conference and the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Attendance is free.

Webinar: 2012 International AIDS Conference overview

The fourth workshop in the current series of free open discussion forums for people living with HIV hosted by the AIDS Committee of Toronto (ACT) will be held on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 at 7:00 pm at the Ramada Plaza Hotel, 300 Jarvis Street in Toronto. 

This month, the forum will provide an overview of both the International AIDS Conference held in Washington in July 2012 and the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC), held in San Francisco this past September. 

The guest speaker is Dr Sharon Walmsley, professor of medicine at the University of Toronto and assistant director and clinical staff physician, Immunodeficiency and Infectious Diseases, at Toronto’s University Health Network. 

Topics to be discussed at the forum include: 

  • Based on presentations at the 2012 International AIDS Conference, what new information is there and what could we expect to hear more about?
  • Overview of the San Francisco Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

The forum will be webcast live so those who cannot attend in person can participate in the event online. The forum and the webcast will begin promptly at 7:00 pm and last two hours. 

To join the live webinar: login at 7:00 pm EDT on December 5 (00:00 UTC, December 6) at www.actoronto.org/forum   

The forum will also be recorded and should be available for viewing on the day following the event at the same website: www.actoronto.org/forum  

This forum and webinar are free and no registration is required. For those attending in person, a light buffet will be available from 6:00 pm. 

For more information, see the flyer below or contact Robin Rhodes at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or 416 340 8484 ext. 219.

Oct25

AIDS-free generation?

Thursday, 25 October 2012 Written by // CATIE - HIV and Hep C Info Resource Categories // International AIDS Conference , Conferences, As Prevention , CATIE, Health, Sexual Health, International , Treatment, CATIE - HIV and Hep C Info Resource

CATIE reviews the landscape. "While we are still years away from an ‘AIDS free generation,’ we appear to be on the right path."

AIDS-free generation?

This article first appeared on the website of CATIE  here.  

Une version française est disponible ici

Recent advancements in our understanding of HIV transmission, treatment, prevention and testing are changing the landscape of our response to HIV and generating a significant amount of optimism. The buzz at the International AIDS Conference this past July in Washington D.C. was that we may now be able to achieve an ‘AIDS-free generation’ where first, no one will be born with the virus; second, that as people age, they will be at a far lower risk of becoming infected than they are today; and third, that if they do acquire HIV, they will get treatment that keeps them healthy and prevents them from transmitting the virus to others.

Similarly, the United Nations AIDS organization has launched a ‘Getting to Zero’ campaign for this World AIDS Day, December 1, signifying the aim of getting to zero new infections, zero AIDS-related deaths, and zero discrimination.  

There are many reasons why we should feel these commendable goals can be achieved. But there are also significant challenges that need to be addressed before we get there.

New understanding about HIV

First, a word about those things that give us confidence.

We now have newer medications for people living with HIV that are easier to take and have fewer side-effects, thereby making HIV treatment more manageable. These medications also allow people living with HIV to have a near-normal life expectancy. We also have a much better understanding of the importance of starting treatment earlier in order to achieve better health outcomes.

Treatment can also help prevent the transmission of HIV. Research shows that people living with the virus who are on successful antiretroviral therapy and have a fully suppressed viral load (undetectable) are less likely to pass HIV onto others.

Due to these advancements in our understanding of the virus, treatment guidelines now recommend that people living with HIV begin antiretroviral therapy as soon as they are ready after diagnosis.

The importance of early detection

To complement the uptake of early treatment, we have also made progress in developing new testing technologies and strategies that allow us to detect HIV earlier and faster than ever before, allowing HIV-positive people to learn about their status much sooner after becoming infected. 

Early diagnosis is crucial to our success in preventing HIV transmission for three major reasons.  First, it may help identify people during the first few months after HIV infection when their viral load and risk of HIV transmission is at an all-time high. Second, it gives newly diagnosed individuals the option to start treatment earlier. And lastly, the majority of people diagnosed with HIV take active measures to reduce their risk of passing HIV on to others.

New prevention approaches

Although condoms and clean needles are the backbone of our prevention efforts, we are learning about additional prevention tools that can also be used. We now know that the same drugs used to treat HIV can be used by HIV-negative people to help reduce their risk of an HIV infection. These preventative approaches are known as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). While PEP is the standard of care for occupational exposure to HIV, its availability for non-occupational exposures and its cost vary greatly across Canada. Although PrEP is not currently approved for use by Health Canada, some doctors may already be prescribing it to their patients (known as ‘off-label’ use).These new prevention approaches are promising options for HIV-negative people who are at a high risk of getting HIV.

HIV drugs, in combination with other strategies such as not breastfeeding can also help eliminate the transmission of the virus from an HIV-positive mother to her newborn child.

Challenges we still face

Despite these advancements, translating them into a generation without AIDS or without new HIV infections remains challenging. The hurdles we continue to face include limited financial resources applied to HIV prevention and treatment, and the barriers people living with and at-risk of HIV face when accessing HIV-related services.

Additionally, people living with HIV can be criminally prosecuted for not disclosing their HIV status to their sexual partners, which can discourage them from wanting to know their status, and thereby opting out of getting tested.

Stigma, discrimination, and poverty can make it difficult for marginalized populations to access services, which explains why some populations are more strongly affected by the HIV epidemic. The reality is that a number of Canada’s communities have a high prevalence of HIV. According to the latest estimates (2008) by the Public Health Agency of Canada, gay men and other men who have sex with men represent a majority (51 per cent) of people living with HIV. People who use injection drugs represent 20 per cent, people from regions where HIV is endemic (such as Africa and the Caribbean) represent 14 per cent, and Aboriginal people represent eight per cent of the total HIV epidemic in Canada.  

Where do we go from here?

It’s clearer than ever that HIV prevention, testing, care and support, and treatment are all mutually reinforcing elements of an effective response to realizing an ‘AIDS-free generation.’ At CATIE, we feel these advancements call for an ‘integrated approach’ to HIV treatment and prevention. Such an approach will be discussed, for example, in September, 2013, when CATIE will host a forum that will explore the recent developments in HIV and determine ways to integrate HIV treatment and prevention for us to move forward in an effective way.

While we are still years away from an ‘AIDS free generation,’ we appear to be on the right path. It only takes a look back 30 years ago at the despair we once felt in the face of this unknown disease to see how far we’ve come. 

Oct04

Hands up

Thursday, 04 October 2012 Written by // Bob Leahy - Editor Categories // International AIDS Conference , Social Media, Activism, Conferences, Arts and Entertainment, Youth, International , Population Specific , Bob Leahy

YAHAnet pulls of an impressive show of hands at IAS 2012 and follows it up with a lively virtual exhibit.

Hands up

The photo mosaic above (created by the YAHAnet team using AndreaMosaic) is made up of all the scanned hand photo messages of the people who participated in this project at the IAS 2012 YAHAnet booth!

What do the hands of 313 people visiting Washington DC tell you?  A lot if they were visitors to the YAHAnet booth at the International AIDS Society's conference in July 2012. But you don’t have to have been there to see the evidence, because the good folks at YAHAnet brought it all home.

Here’s how their website describes what they did “From July 22 to 27, 2012, YAHAnet ran an interactive booth (#633) in the Global Village of the XIX International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2012). Chandra, Lukas, and John of the YAHAnet team met and had wonderful discussions with amazing youth leaders, activists, not-for-profit representatives, health researchers, and healthcare providers. 313 photos of visitors' hands were printed off and attached to clotheslines around the booth, with handwritten messages on the photos declaring what is needed to "take the LEAD to get to zero"!

“Getting to zero” relates to the UNAIDS 2010-2015 strategy - getting to zero new HIV infections, zero discrimination and zero AIDS-related deaths.

Neat idea,  eh?  Better still, YAHAnet took all the photos home and with a bit of techie wizardry, all the photos are online in a virtual exhibit.

You can view that virtual exhibit here

Some message are in English but there are also many other languages represented, from 68 different countries.  A lot of them speak to youth empowerment  - “ Empower Young People”,  “Listen to Youth”, “It’s Our Turn” are examples.  But other participants chose to leave more general, sometimes  touching messages – like “Love Conquers All”,  “Love, peace, hope, coolness”, “Start dancing, stop AIDS”. You’ll love browsing through this exhibit, believe me.

Almost all the images are also on YAHAnet’s Facebook page . Look at them here.

Big kudos to YAHAnet for doing something engaging, powerful and lasting. In the words of the Who’s’ 1965 song, which predates the  organizers by quite a bit, the kids are alright.

About YAHAnet:  YAHAnet is an innovative networking platform that provides young people from around the world with the opportunity to actively and creatively participate in the fight against HIV & AIDS using an interdisciplinary approach which combines public health, education, art, and technology. Follow them on Facebook here or twitter @YAHAnet here

Sep07

Are We A Dying Breed?

Friday, 07 September 2012 Written by // Dave R Categories // Activism, International AIDS Conference , Conferences, Living with HIV, Opinion Pieces, Dave R

Dave R writes...is HIV-activism largely an issue for the older generation, or can we rely on the young people of our community to fight on for their rights when we’re gone?

Are We A Dying Breed?

Call me an old cynic (guilty) but I’m beginning to feel that individuals within governments and health organisations can’t wait for the day when the ‘bulge’ in HIV cases has flattened out and died a natural death.

Basically the ‘bulge’ consists of people who were infected between say, 1985 and 1995. Keeping us alive in days of austerity and purse-tightening may be less of a priority than it once was when the whole population seemed to be threatened by the virus. The majority may have died in those years and the years before combination therapies arrived but enough survived, to become a significant drain on health budgets today. Not only have we survived but our bodies are aging more quickly than our age suggests and we’re showing signs of years and years of heavy medication use. However, getting older from a spin-doctor’s perspective, means being non-productive; not contributing to the economy and exhibiting signs of age-related diseases which may or may not be related to HIV. This is not to mention the cost of treating us. Not exactly a politician’s dream demographic! Never mind; to solve their problem, we’ll all be gone soon; leaving just the more evenly-spread and possibly fewer, ‘younger’ cases to deal with. It is in those groups that ‘the end of AIDS’ may become a reality, if only because economies may be better able to deal with them.

Of course, this has to be seen in the context of developed countries and not the desperately poor lands in the third world. In those places, there is no question of an HIV ‘bulge’ because HIV is spread through the generations. The problem is logistically different and much, much larger and has to be tackled by governments and international aid agencies providing the necessary resources. This may end up depending on the good will of pharmaceutical companies in reducing their medication costs (I don’t need to be cynical here; you all know how that will turn out!) but for the purposes of this article, I’m talking about the western, HIV baby boomers, who never had babies which would grow up and contribute to society.

It’s true; in a few decades, all the heroes, the battlers and survivors of the eighties and nineties will pass into history, leaving a new but much smaller generation of HIV patients who will probably have access to better medicines and who knows  - maybe even a cure, or a vaccine. This is of course, unless PrEP and treatment as prevention go horribly wrong and the virus re-emerges triumphant and resistant. On the other hand, maybe HIV will disappear in the same way that smallpox and other major viruses have. The question should be asked though; will we be remembered in two hundred years time? Possibly not.

From 1918 to 1920, after the First World War, there was an influenza pandemic that wiped out between 50 and 130 million people across the world and 500 million were infected. It was less than a hundred years ago! It is thought to have been a sort of avian flu and could easily happen again. Viruses are like that; they flare up when you least expect them and it has always been so. HIV just follows the pattern. However, do we remember the dead, the survivors and their stories in that influenza pandemic? Any of them? How many of us even know that it happened? So assuming that our dead and survivors will enter the history books is optimistic at best. Personally, I find that idea horrifying but that’s how the shit goes down on this planet.

So, as survivors of what turned out not to be the world-consuming plague everybody feared; should we be surprised that for us, the air has gone out of the HIV motivation balloon somewhat? The 2012  International AIDS Conference in Washington left me feeling distinctly underwhelmed (I wasn’t there – so all criticism valid). Maybe it was because the agenda seemed to be modified to suit American media tastes (first time it was held in the U.S.); or maybe because men who have sex with men, drug users and sex workers were largely ignored and left out of the main debates (possibly also linked to the first reason); or maybe because the conclusions were so lukewarm and clichéd, you wonder why 24,000 people bothered turning up! Don’t get me wrong; I’m sure a great deal of useful work was done in Washington but the overall impression is not one of innovation and progress...maybe that’s a public relations problem!

‘The delegates came away with ‘...the end of AIDS is in sight’ ringing in their ears. No it’s not! Nothing was said or proved at the conference to back up that piece of propaganda. AIDS will end either when the virus dies a natural death (as is the way with viruses), or a cure, or vaccine is found, or when the entire male population of the world becomes impotent, (keep following the obesity diet guys).

It’s all a chess match of course and if it weren’t so serious we could all have a laugh at these games of thrones within the political structures dealing with HIV. These conferences are not for the average HIV Joe going about his business and trying to make the best of it; they’re aimed at much higher and more intangible targets. Conferences present the public face of HIV/IDS. They are intended to make sure funding is there, or is continued, or is increased. They are there to sway political opinion, so that delegates then go back to their local administrations and try to squeeze out a few more dollars to support the cause. Key note speakers are invited to get media attention. Sir Elton is and always has been a huge HIV benefactor, so his motives cannot really be questioned but apart from saying the same things he’s said for years, he didn’t really add anything new to the subject. Hilary Clinton also looked at the past and the present but had little to say about the future. Their value lay in the fact that national newspapers and TV stations would report their presence and therefore engender publicity. Obama didn’t come but apart from the obvious election year pitfalls of turning up at an AIDS Conference; there was nothing for him to be there for. If there had been news of a cure, or a vaccine, or a massive injection of public funds, you can bet your bottom dollar that his face would have grinned at us from all the posters.

So the first generations of HIV patients should maybe accept the fact that, apart from a declining number of vocal activists who are still doing their best, we’re maybe not going to be heard any more and the baton should be passed on to the younger generations. We can bitch from the sidelines (like this particular grumpy old man loves to do) but we may never be the power for good that we once were. I’m sure people like Larry Kramer will grind his teeth at the very idea.

The problem is that the younger generations are less than enthusiastic at the idea of carrying the torch into the future because their experience of HIV has been radically different. They don’t have skeletal, dying men imprinted on their retinas; so they look at HIV as an irritating and sometimes dangerous disease but not a particularly deadly one. They know what’s happening in the third world but as with all third world catastrophes, those things are comfortably far away. What they don’t realise is that public opinion is a fickle mistress and they need to be alert to political responses to populist extremism. If HIV is not seen as a vote winner and being anti LGBT, or anti HIV will gain politicians political power, then we’re all in trouble. Stigmatism will rise; criminalisation laws may be judicially just the beginning; money will mysteriously dry up; trends in HIV (such as the recent alarming increase amongst the black populations of US cities) will be pushed onto the back burner and the fight against the virus will be seen as politically incorrect. That’s why, dying breed or not, every voice that questions why, what or how, is as important as it has ever been. Whether we’ll be still be listened to, or be taken seriously either by the powers that be, or even our own people, remains to be seen. I suspect, as I said at the beginning, that in certain circles, there may not be many tears shed, when we wrinkly old thorns in the side of the health establishment finally pop our clogs.

‘Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better.  It's not’.  Dr. Seuss

 

Arts and Entertainment Section

Activism Section

Current Affairs Section

Events Section

Features and Interviews Section

Health Section

International Section

  • Infectiousness

    Infectiousness

    Aidsmap.com reports about 10% of gay men taking antiretroviral treatment have low levels of HIV detectable in their semen, according to new research. Whether or not this level of HIV in semen is associated with transmission is unknown.
  • Gay men and sex

    Gay men and sex

    Aidsmap.com reports consistent decline in partner numbers in US gay men in last decade, but no change in condom use
  • Get it on –- with condoms

    Get it on –- with condoms

    It’s back to the basics for this winning New Zealand HIV prevention campaign which stresses condom use and tells us why with sexy pictures and videos.

Legal Section

Lifestyle Section

Living with HIV Section

Media Section

  • Top ten

    Top ten

    From PrEP to porn. Bob Leahy looks at PositiveLite.com’s ten most popular posts in the last six months. How many of these did you miss?
  • Cancellation

    Cancellation

    Sad news. This is the last blog entry from Christopher Banks. Here Christopher explains why.
  • The wild birds win BUT . .

    The wild birds win BUT . .

    Megan DePutter isn’t angry. In fact she’s delighted that AIDS Committee of Guelph’s close second place finish in the Canada’s Worst Charity Website contest netted her agency a $15,000 website makeover..

Opinion Pieces Section

Population Specific Section

Sex and Sexuality Section

MarketPlace