Subscribe to our RSS feed

Articles tagged with: Richard Elliott

Dec07

Stephen Lewis headlines Legal Network’s 20th anniversary celebration in style

Friday, 07 December 2012 Written by // Bob Leahy - Editor Categories // Activism, Events, Legal, Bob Leahy

It’s been a difficult year for the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network whose work supports the rights of people living with HIV. But they came out swinging with fighting words and star power at their 20th anniversary gala celebration in Toronto this week.

Stephen Lewis headlines Legal Network’s 20th anniversary celebration in style

Executive Director Richard Elliott said it best. “This year has had more challenges than achievements” he confessed to an attentive crowd at the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network’s 20th anniversary gala in Toronto this past week.

Here’s what the Legal Network has faced in the space of a few short months.  Funding cuts, courtesy of the Federal Government who will no longer fund anything even smelling slightly of advocacy. A stinging defeat at the Supreme Court where two high profile appeals dealing with criminalization of non disclosure resulted in a major setback with disclosure now required in all cases except for the safest of safe sex. And then just last week, perhaps an even crueler blow as Bill C-398 which the Legal Network pumped their heart and soul in to supporting went down, if not in flames, at least to defeat in a close vote at second reading. The term “Oy vey!’ was invented for these folks’ fortunes of late.

Anybody who knows the Legal Network and Richard Elliott in particular, who  just last week was awarded the Queen's Diamond Jubilee Medal in Ottawa, knows none of these setbacks happened through want of trying. It’s our experience, in fact, that the Legal Network, under Richard’s direction, is one of the most hard working, dedicated and persistent working units in the HIV community.

Which is why it was a pleasure to celebrate – yes, celebrate - with them this week at toney Convocation Hall in downtown Toronto, where 20 years of work were being lauded as well as two awards handed out for excellence in human rights issues.  Well known HIV physician Dr. Philip Berger won the Canadian award and the Andrew Rylkov Foundation won too for its work in challenging Russia’s draconian drug laws.

The star of the show however was undeniably Stephen Lewis, formerly special envoy to the United Nations on HIV/AIDS in Africa.  An eloquent speaker at the best of times, the silver tongued 75-year old did not disappoint. I managed to corner him before he spoke with a question I’d thought was a bright one. Mr Lewis” I said, “Canada is such a liberal thinking country. Why are we leaders in prosecutions for non disclosure of HIV?” “We are NOT a liberal thinking  country” he said. “Of course that’s the answer  I said, immediately regretting I hadn’t asked him something brighter.

Behind the podium, Lewis was in fine form, immediately launching in to a glowing appraisal of the Legal Network. ”I am an immense fan - an unrestrained fan – of Richard Elliott, a shameless groupie” he said to laughter. “I love the work of the Legal Network. They are an astonishing organization, I want you all to recognize the enormous reach … it has an impact and integrity and reputation which is absolutely stunning around the world. Whether in Canada you are dealing with questions  of injection drug use in the downtown eastside of Vancouver or whether you are dealing with decriminalization - where the Legal Network is right and the Supreme Court of Canada is wrong and one day the Supreme Court will  understand the errors of their ways – or whether you are dealing with the astonishing defence by the Legal Network of Canadian access to medicine legislation, defeated by a reactionary, arbitrary, Neanderthal  government whose ugly response to the legislation stands as an iniquitous moment in Canadian political history. That  a piece of legislation which could have saved hundreds and thousands and millions of lives was considered inconsequential by the government and was defeated by seven votes, perfectly orchestrated, is a real shame on the integrity of the Canadian political system, and it’s heartbreaking.  But it just means you rise to fight another day.”

Lewis described the decision of Health Canada to reduce the Legal Network’s funding as “absolutely outrageous, to cut back the funding on the suspicion that the material produced by the Legal Network might conceivably lead to advocacy is so insubstantial and nonsensical, it’s deeply wounding and offensive.”

Lewis spent some time too outlining his concerns for global health. “Let me remind you that there are 34 million people on the planet living with AIDS.  There are 8 million people in treatment.  We have a tremendous way to go before we can secure the health and survival of the other 26 million."

The indefatigable Richard Elliott was up next, his speech concentrating heavily on HIV human rights issues and the manner in which they had been tackled since day one.  “It was clear early on in the epidemic” he said “that HIV would travel along and therefore expose the social fault lines of inequality, that HIV was not just a public heath disaster of staggering proportions but also a human rights disaster.  And so it was also clear that any effective response to the epidemic would not only need to overcome the understandable fear of disease and death but would also need to challenge the deep seated range of prejudices against sex and drugs….The law for better or worse, plays a role in the evolution of the epidemic.  Too often the law is hindering HIV prevention and care, too often it directs and enables abuse and deprivation “

I was particularly interested in what Richard would have to say about Bill C-398 as work in my own community has included collaborating locally with the Grannies for Africa to persuade our (conservative) MP to vote in favour of the bill. Richard has been incredibly helpful in this regard. Here’s what Richard said to the attentive crowd at the gala. “We started over knowing that it was going to be a tough slog. We have built an extraordinary coalition. I have to salute in particular the Grandmothers Advocacy Network. Despite all the efforts last week, that came to an end when the forces that are currently arrayed against those reforms won a crucial vote in the House of  Commons by seven votes,  However we can be proud of what we did and the work that we did to build that coalition is not for naught and we can turn that energy and that anger and our hope to something different.”

On the Supreme Court decision Richard mourned the setback but took consolation in the fact that “without our intervention the court will have likely not recognized that perhaps we shouldn’t be prosecuting people for aggravated sexual assault, at least in cases of safer sex.” 

All in all it was a stirring and buoyant evening. Clearly the Legal Network could do with help financially – Stephen Lewis urged the crowd to take out memberships – but they are strong in spirit and resolve. Anyone who interacts with them often, as does PositiveLite.com, knows that their work continues unabated.

Like the Grannies, they remain a force to be reckoned with.

********

Coincidentally, CANFAR has just released more videos in their "Thinking Positive, with Valerie Pringle" series which includes a good interview with Stephen Lewis.  We've included it below.

photos by Bob Leahy

Nov30

A special video message from Executive Director Richard Elliott and an Awards for Action (Dec 4 2012) sneak peek!

Friday, 30 November 2012 Categories // Community Events, Activism, Events, Legal, Revolving Door, Guest Authors

PositiveLite.com supports the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network in every way we can because, like the work they do for people living with HIV, it’s the right thing to do. Here Richard Elliott explains, with news of a special event featuring Stephen Lewis.

A special video message from Executive Director Richard Elliott and an Awards for Action (Dec 4 2012) sneak peek!

Richard Elliott: This has been an important year for the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network. In recent weeks you have likely heard from us with updates on critical issues that affect the lives of people living with and vulnerable to HIV/AIDS. I wanted to inform you directly about these activities, as we have been at the forefront of very important issues, with many clear victories. If you have a few minutes, please take the time to watch this short video update  below. 

I would like to also remind you to join us on December 4, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. at the Law Society of Upper Canada (Convocation Hall) to celebrate the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network and honour recipients of the 2012 Awards for Action on HIV/AIDS and Human Rights - Dr. Philip Berger (Canadian recipient) and the Andrey Rylkov Foundation for Health and Social Justice (International recipient).

The Awards for Action were established in 2002 by the Legal Network and Human Rights Watch to highlight outstanding contributions that decrease vulnerability to HIV and AIDS and protect the rights and dignity of those infected and affected. They honour excellence and commitment to work that has a direct impact on HIV and AIDS and human rights issues - and particularly work that directly benefits marginalized individuals and communities.

This event will also celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network - a global leader in the movement for health and human rights.

We are thrilled to have Stephen Lewis as our keynote speaker. As a Canadian politician, diplomat and international envoy for humanitarian efforts, Stephen Lewis has dedicated himself to improving the human condition and is a dear friend of the Legal Network. Formerly the Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, he is Chair of the Board of the Stephen Lewis Foundation in Canada, Distinguished Visiting Professor at Ryerson University in Toronto, and Co-Director of AIDS-Free World, an international AIDS advocacy organization based in the United States.

In addition to Stephen, we are delighted to have Suhana Meharchand from CBC News as our host and we will also have a special performance by Andrew Forde, a dynamic violinist who has shared the stage with such talents as Mary J. Blige, Sting, Justin Bieber, Sheryl Crow, Akon, Pitbull, Kardinal Offishall, k-os and Eddie Bullen to name a few.

For tickets visit www.aidslaw.ca/awards. Awards for Action 2012 promises to be a night to remember!

Thank you for your continued support, and we hope to see you soon, 

Richard Elliott, Executive Director, Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network 

(Editor’s note: For those unable to attend, PositiveLite.com will be covering this event. )

 

 

Nov21

Kinder, gentler, more understanding.

Monday, 21 November 2011 Written by // Megan DePutter - Life Categories // Activism, Legal, Opinion Pieces, Megan DePutter

Looking back on the past, Megan DePutter reflects on how her approach to activism has changed over the years and the values she’s learned help to do it better in the present.

Kinder, gentler, more understanding.

When I was 15 years old I wore combat boots and army jackets I found at the Army Surplus store and stage dived into mosh-pits at hardcore shows. I also started up an animal rights group called AREA (Animal Rights and Environmental Awareness) with the aid of my friends. The group gained some great visibility in our city. We worked collaboratively with older, more established animal rights groups in the community. We got vegetarian items put on the school cafeteria menu, organized a trip to Ottawa to protest the seal hunt, and even brought Peter Singer in to give a speech in the school auditorium.

I learned a lot in those early days of activism.  In particular, I learned a lot about what not to do.

When I was 15 I was impressionable, and one of my first experiences of activism came from PETA (People Against the Ethical Treatment of Animals). I now know PETA to be a giant wheel of propaganda that uses shock techniques to jar and horrify people into obedience. Their president, Ingrid Newkirk, famously compared chickens in slaughterhouses to holocaust victims.

Our group was much more moderate. We didn’t use direct action techniques, we conducted peaceful protests. We made signs and banners and costumes, did a lot of letter writing, hosted meetings in the public library and held benefit concerts.

One day, during a protest in downtown London (Ontario), a PETA representative joined us. He argued fiercely with any member of the public who dared to question our cause. “Happy heart attack,” he shouted at one man. “That’s not how we do things here,” I thought. “He’s alienating the people we are trying to reach.”

Yet, I too had an extremist attitude. I sneered at “vegans” who ate commercial baked goods where the last ingredient happened to be lactic acid. I shoved graphic PETA literature at everyone I could. My favourite t-shirts had logos like “Oscar Murder” and “Dairy is Rape.”

meganactivism2

I don’t regret the illegal methods of activism we occasionally used, but I do regret my attitude. At the age of 15, I saw things as black and white, us versus them, right and wrong. I lacked understanding, compassion or flexibility towards people who were not 100% committed to our goals and mentality as activists. I’m certain it turned people off.

Flash forward 15 years. I’m no longer a vegetarian; in fact, I’ll eat just about anything, even pigs’ ears and bone marrow. I’m no longer an animal rights activist. But activism is still a part of my life.

My cause has changed, but I’m also a much better communicator now and a lot more moderate. That being said, I don’t budge on my values or issues that are important to me. And sometimes I see myself lacking in patience when communicating to others about these issues. Take the criminalization of HIV non-disclosure. My very first fight with my boyfriend happened early in the relationship and it was over this subject. I can’t even remember why I brought the issue up. I think I mentioned it in passing as part of what bothered me that day. I expected him to just understand, to get it, to see clearly as to how criminalization was causing ripples - no, tidal waves - of problems.  It caused a fight because my scientist boyfriend, naturally curious and trained to be sceptical, questioned me, and didn’t like my “I’m right about this and I don’t want to hear anything different” attitude.

Issues like this get me worked up quickly, because it’s an emotional discussion for me. But how can I expect a lay person to understand this complex issue without a proper introduction? Most people don’t even know the basic facts about HIV transmission, let alone the complexities that accompany disclosure and the law. I should have taken more time to gradually introduce the issue.

At “The Art and Science of Knowledge Exchange,”a conference put on by CATIE, Richard Elliot gave a presentation called “Raising the Bar to Limit the Law: Principle and Pragmatism in Educating Criminal Justice System Actors on HIV.” The lecture reminded me that lay people empathize with the HIV negative person in a criminal case because they relate to them, so they need to be brought in to the conversation in ways that allow them to see different sides of the issue. Other lectures at the conference, like “Knowledge Exchange in the Moral Borderland” by Dan Small, made me think about the process of changing cultural norms. Whether we’re trying to get the community on board with harm reduction, safe injection sites or prosecutorial guidelines on HIV non-disclosure, we need to work on a more fundamental level of helping people reflect on the values that inform their beliefs. These shifts need to accompany sufficient knowledge so that people can re-imagine and reinterpret roles and concepts like law, public health, human rights and risk management.

It’s not easy. But shifts in values and culture are sea-changes that require patience on the part of the captain.

 

Dec15

Following up on a Promise: The Yonge and Dundas Die-in

Wednesday, 15 December 2010 Written by // Bob Leahy - Editor Categories // Events, Bob Leahy

In which Bob Leahy returns to the topic of the Yonge and Dundas Die-in, why it's important and who is on top of it.

Following up on a Promise: The Yonge and Dundas Die-in

Yesterday in this post I made a gentle dig at the organizers of the die-in supporting Bill C-393 for not going viral the same day. Well, I knew they would come through. Today, YouTube sports not one but two videos about the die-in.

You can view them both below.

I remember taking part in a die-in like this some years ago in Montreal. It was about funding.  It felt downright peculiar to lie on the hard ground of a busy sidewalk, albeit kind of empowering. To be honest, I was kind of glad to get up after a minute – a very long minute - had passed. And that was in the summer months. Nowadays, overt AIDS-activism on the streets like this - on one of the coldest days of the year, in this case - is so uncommon in our community we need to sit up and pay attention when it occurs.

At Yonge and Dundas, judging from the videos, passers-by seemed to go about their business while the protest was underway.  But engaging passers-by is not really what these events are about..  It's all about getting noticed by the media.  Certainly Toronto’s on-line community is good at paying attention to events like this, and came through again this time. Those not tapped in to it are just not tapped in, period. They just need more time.

So yay to the organizers for raising the profile of this very important issue at just the right time. Yay to the student protesters for not only latching on to this issue, but doing something about it.  Yay to all the protesters for braving the cold.   Yay to Richard Elliott for giving such a good interview (and having such rosy cheeks while doing so). And yay to those who are recognizing that social networking is an unparalleled way to get the message out on  events and issues like this.

 God, it almost makes me want to love Twitter.

MarketPlace